• Pages

    • Home
    • Vision
    • Contact Us
    • Bios
    • Poll Archives
    • Previous SCO Archives
  • Blogroll

  • Resources

  • Church Directory

  • Archives

  • Posts by Date

    September 2010
    S M T W T F S
    « Aug    
     1234
    567891011
    12131415161718
    19202122232425
    2627282930  
  • Polls

    What is your view of the Health Insurance Reform Bill?

    • Should be repealed (81%, 21 Votes)
    • Did not go far enough (12%, 3 Votes)
    • About the right amount of change (4%, 1 Votes)
    • Does too much (4%, 1 Votes)
    • Not concerned about it (0%, 0 Votes)

    Total Voters: 26

    Loading ... Loading ...
    • Polls Archive
  • Categories

    • Abortion
    • Admin
    • Atheism
    • Books
      • Book Reviews
    • By Contributor
      • Doug
      • Jim
      • Mark O.
      • Mark S.
      • Rusty
      • Tom
    • China
    • Conservative
    • Culture
    • Economics & Taxes
    • Education
      • Homeschooling
    • Energy
    • Environment
      • Global Warming
    • Ethics & Morality
    • Government
      • Foreign Policy
      • Healthcare
    • Homosexuality
    • Humor
    • Judiciary
    • Liberal
    • Links
    • Marriage
    • Media
    • Medicine
    • Middle East
      • Iran
      • Iraq
      • Israel
    • Military
    • Movies
      • Movie Reviews
    • Music
    • Politics
      • Democrats
      • Republicans
    • Polls
    • Quotes
    • Race Issues
    • Religion
      • Christianity
        • Catholicism
        • Evangelicals
          • Evangelical Leadership
        • Mormonism
        • Orthodox
        • Protestantism
      • Islam
      • Judaism
    • Russia
    • Science
      • Evolution
      • Intelligent Design
      • Stem Cells
    • Software
      • Software Reviews
    • Space
    • Sports
    • Television
    • Uncategorized
    • United Nations
    • Venezuela
    • War
    • You Cry Out
  • Elsewhere

    Blog Network:
    Name:
    Stones Cry Out
    Topics:
    christianity, religion, current events
    Join my network
    Blog Networks

  • Recent Comments

    • Twitter Trackbacks for Stones Cry Out - If they keep silent… » Passing the evangelical torch: Overcoming Spiritual Superficiality [stonescryout.org] on Topsy.com on Passing the evangelical torch: Overcoming Spiritual Superficiality
    • Twitter Trackbacks for Stones Cry Out - If they keep silent… » Friday Link Wrap-up [stonescryout.org] on Topsy.com on Friday Link Wrap-up
    • 8 Simple Reasons | Olde Frothingblog on 8 good reasons I won’t be watching Glenn Beck’s America’s Divine Destiny event on TV tonight
    • 8 Simple Reasons - In The Agora on 8 good reasons I won’t be watching Glenn Beck’s America’s Divine Destiny event on TV tonight
    • Jim on Is "World Vision" a Christian Organization?
    • The Constitutional Case Against the Ground Zero Mosque « Undoctrination.org on The Martyrs of Cordoba
    • Doug on Stop Tinkering!
    • Mark O. on Stop Tinkering!
    • Mark O. on Things Heard: e135v2
    • Dan Trabue on Things Heard: e135v2
  • Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries RSS
    • Comments RSS
    • WordPress.org
  • prolifeblogs


Prev/Next Posts
« Government Considered | Home | A What-If Poll »
Wednesday, October 29th, 2008 at 8:59 am

Things Heard: e38v3

By Mark O.
  • Sexual mores and the fault line and more on that fault line and  5-d or 2-d morality.
  • Spreading the wealth and some founders quotes. And considering consequences of the same.
  • All or none, no?
  • Secrets, anonymity, and “send Frank a secret”.
  • Green and concert going.
  • On being sans salt.
  • Time and regret.
  • More links.
  • Oil and canvas yet again.
This entry is filed under Links, Mark O.. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
7 Responses to “Things Heard: e38v3”
1
Rodney Olsen says:
October 29th, 2008 at 9:06 am

Thank you for the link. :)

2
Dan Trabue says:
October 29th, 2008 at 2:20 pm

Spreading the wealth, PROGRESSIVE TAXATION and the founding fathers:

“Another means of silently lessening the inequality of property is to exempt all from taxation below a certain point, and to tax the higher portions of property in geometrical progression as they rise.”

~Thomas Jefferson to James Madison, 1785

“The collection of taxes… has been as yet only by duties on consumption. As these fall principally on the rich, it is a general desire to make them contribute the whole money we want, if possible. And we have a hope that they will furnish enough for the expenses of government and the interest of our whole public debt, foreign and domestic.”

~Thomas Jefferson to Comte de Moustier, 1790

“The rich alone use imported articles, and on these alone the whole taxes of the General Government are levied. … Our revenues liberated by the discharge of the public debt, and its surplus applied to canals, roads, schools, etc., the farmer will see his government supported, his children educated, and the face of his country made a paradise by the contributions of the rich alone, without his being called on to spend a cent from his earnings.”

~Thomas Jefferson to Thaddeus Kosciusko, 1811

“The great mass of the articles on which impost is paid is foreign luxuries, purchased by those only who are rich enough to afford themselves the use of them. Their patriotism would certainly prefer its continuance and application to the great purposes of the public education, roads, rivers, canals, and such other objects of public improvement as it may be thought proper to add to the constitutional enumeration of federal powers.”

~Thomas Jefferson: 6th Annual Message, 1806

The Jefferson and other quotes at your link were about taking one person’s wealth and giving it to another. No one is arguing about that. Clearly it is wrong to take one person’s stuff and give it to another.

But just as clearly, Jefferson (and I believe many of the others) supported a PROGRESSIVE taxation system where, according to Jefferson, the WHOLE of the gov’t’s tax moneys could come from the wealthiest people and it would be a patriotic thing for them to contribute such money in order to make America “a paradise” for the poor farmers and others scraping by.

so, in summation, TAKING STUFF is wrong.

Taxing the wealthy more than the least of these is a good thing. The majority of Americans agree with this (see polls), Jefferson agreed with it and I’d suggest anyone concerned about justice would agree. Now, I’m not willing to go so far as Jefferson and suggest that ALL of our tax moneys should come from the wealthy, nor am I able to say what Jefferson would think about our current system, but clearly, he favored progressive taxation in general, contrary to what the person at your link is suggesting.

3
Dan Trabue says:
October 29th, 2008 at 2:27 pm

Gallup poll on taxing the rich.

4
Mark O. says:
October 29th, 2008 at 4:15 pm

Dan,
The founders, I think, would have been appalled at the notion of an income tax. That wasn’t established until the 20th century. What you’re referring to above is a luxury tax.

Hey, I’ll go for that! I’m with Jefferson 100%. Let’s eliminate income and wage taxes and replace that with consumption and luxury taxes alone. That is what the founders are talking about when they refer to progressive taxation. Are you for that?

As for your remarks on polling data, almost everybody (especially those who aren’t thinking about it very hard) are in favor of heavier taxes on somebody else. That gallup poll is meaningless.

5
Dan Trabue says:
October 30th, 2008 at 11:25 am

Meaningless? It is a reflection of some of your fellow citizens’ opinions.

I’m not opposed to sales tax or consumption taxes as long as they meet Jefferson’s criteria: That they don’t impose a hardship upon the poor and that they raise enough income to meet the needs of the commonwealth. Our circumstances are different now, though, so I’m not sure a sales tax would be the most efficient way of doing things. But if you can make a proposal for a plan that raises the money that gov’t needs and that does not place undue hardships on the poor, go for it.

6
Mark O. says:
October 30th, 2008 at 10:08 pm

Dan,
So what? I don’t form my opinion based on a poll of my neighbors … and neither do you I might add.

7
Dan Trabue says:
October 30th, 2008 at 10:39 pm

Thank you, you are correct. We don’t form our opinions based on polls, nor should we. BUT, we do form our laws based roughly on majority rule. If the majority of Americans think the most moral, ethical and practical system to raise gov’t money is a progressive income tax, then that is what we’ll have. It would be encumbent upon those in the minority to make a good enough argument to change the minds of those in the majority if they want change.

That’s why it matters.

I’d probably implement laws that would encourage a whole lot less driving - perhaps a higher gas tax or something. But I’m in the minority on that point. It matters to me what the majority thinks when I think they’re wrong. I’d think it would matter to you, too.

Leave a Reply

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe without commenting

Stones Cry Out is powered by WordPress | Using Tiga theme with a bit of Ozh