This is an archive of the old Stones Cry Out site. For the current site, click here.
« All the Proof I Need... | Main | My Questions about Meirs »
October 05, 2005
Standing by Miers and her Evangelical Conscience
I am unabashedly enthusiastic that Harriet Miers has come to faith in Jesus Christ in midlife, and that her evangelical belief will be part of what she brings to her role as a Supreme Court justice, if confirmed. But I do not want to be misunderstood as a Pollyanna Christian who celebrates faith but ignores ability and ideology.
I don’t use the Christian Yellow Pages and, like Martin Luther, I’d rather be ruled by a “competent Turk” than an incompetent Christian. And after working for nearly 30 years in the very bowels of the evangelical community, I know that a person’s Christian faith does not assure competence. Trust me, I know that well.
Anymore than a person’s conservative orthodoxy assures sound moral character.
Those who worship at the feet of William Buckley and see conservatism as life’s guiding light, and particularly those who are more comfortable inside the beltway that inside a church, have decried Miers’ selection and dismissed personal relationships—that the President has with the nominee, and that the nominee has with Jesus Christ—as inferior to a judicial record or a paper trail.
I do not think the evidence of Miers’ evangelical belief is enough to provide comfort to those who want to be assured that she will not slide to liberalism as part of the court. But when I add that to my belief that the President understands the stakes, and he has known Miers as a close colleague for more than 10 years, I am far more comfortable than I am with others who were less known by the Presidents who appointed them (they say Bush 41 couldn’t pick David Souter out of a lineup). [I incorrectly wrote Reagan in an earlier version]
There’s more certainty on some key issues—such as life issues--with Miers than with Roberts, or many others who could have been chosen. How many Republican evangelicals that you have known for 10 years are pro-abortion?
Posted by Jim at October 5, 2005 09:38 AM
Trackback Pings
Comments
President Reagan may not have been able to pick Souter out of a lineup, but he didn't appoint him. Bush 41 did.
Posted by: Richard at October 5, 2005 03:19 PM
Oops. I meant Bush 41. Thanks for pointing out the mistake. I've fixed it.
Posted by: Jim Jewell at October 6, 2005 08:17 AM
I seriously doubt that Martin Luther said what your quote claims he said. Would you mind telling us where you read that remarkable statement. And, where would you find a "competant Turk" anyway?
Posted by: logion at October 10, 2005 12:28 AM
Sorry, it is competent!
Posted by: logion at October 10, 2005 12:34 AM