Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/thepayto/public_html/stonescryout/index.php:1) in /home/thepayto/public_html/stonescryout/wp-content/plugins/all-in-one-seo-pack/app/Common/Meta/Robots.php on line 87

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/thepayto/public_html/stonescryout/index.php:1) in /home/thepayto/public_html/stonescryout/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: Intentions and Actions, Redux https://stonescryout.org/?p=1269 If they keep silent... Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:51:34 +0000 hourly 1 By: Mark O. https://stonescryout.org/?p=1269&cpage=1#comment-3079 Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:51:34 +0000 http://stonescryout.org/?p=1269#comment-3079 Jason,
Well, not in so many words, I’d specifically asked:

I’d add, what specifically is Mr Warren praising him regarding? Did you really find that the Saddleback church’s ministry in Africa had no good effects? What was the nature of their ministry in Uganda?

Which you didn’t answer either.

Are you saying his “occasional” (in scare quotes because you have have no accounting at all in your remarks about Mr Ssempa a comparison of his good vs “non-good” works and how that might fall.

How is it defensible. Well, it looks like the Warren/Ssampa connection regards facilitation of care to orphans and children affected by HIV/AIDS in Uganda. How is that not defensible might be a better question.

By: Jason Kuznicki https://stonescryout.org/?p=1269&cpage=1#comment-3077 Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:09:33 +0000 http://stonescryout.org/?p=1269#comment-3077 He wonders how this could be worse?

Nope. I wondered how it could be defensible. I’m still wondering.

The question I posed, and Mr Kuznicki has failed to address, is to ask is why he discounts aid to HIV infected orphans because Mr Ssempa has a belief in witchcraft, i.e., if one’s beliefs (intentions) aren’t pure … does that discount one’s deeds, i.e., facilitating aid to orphans?

First, you never posed this question before, so I couldn’t possibly have answered it. Second, I most certainly can still find Mr. Ssempa a dangerous madman, and an unreliable public health advocate, even if he still occasionally does good works.