{"id":2001,"date":"2009-07-06T19:26:13","date_gmt":"2009-07-06T23:26:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stonescryout.org\/?p=2001"},"modified":"2009-07-06T19:26:13","modified_gmt":"2009-07-06T23:26:13","slug":"will-obamacare-end-roe-v-wade","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stonescryout.org\/?p=2001","title":{"rendered":"Will Obamacare End <i>Roe v. Wade<\/i>?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>At least according to this article in <a href=\"http:\/\/spectator.org\/archives\/2009\/06\/30\/is-obamacare-the-end-of-roe-v\/print\">The American Spectator<\/a>, the answer is yes:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Stated or unstated, a driving force behind modern liberalism   takes root in the 1973 Supreme Court decision <em>Roe v.   Wade<\/em>, in which abortion was legalized. The Court found a   &#8220;right to privacy&#8221; guaranteed by the due process clause of the   14th Amendment, saying that a woman had a constitutional right to   abort her child up until the &#8220;point at which the fetus becomes   viable.&#8221; The Court quite specifically defined viability as the   point at which a fetus is &#8220;potentially able to live outside the   mother&#8217;s womb, albeit with artificial aid. Viability is usually   placed at about seven months (28 weeks) but may occur earlier,   even at 24 weeks.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Quite aside from the political acrimony the <em>Roe<\/em> decision   has generated from the day it was issued, the hot debate over   President Obama&#8217;s health care proposal alters the abortion debate   in a fashion quite unintended. If passed, ObamaCare could   instantly set up a legal confrontation between the principle   behind President&#8217;s health care system &#8212; and the principle   undergirding <em>Roe v. Wade<\/em>. Which in turn would launch a   political battle royal between proponents of government health   care and abortion rights.<\/p>\n<p>Why?<\/p>\n<p>A reading of the <em>Roe<\/em> decision leaves no doubt whatsoever   of what abortion advocates have claimed ever since the opinion   was handed down. To quote the Supreme Court decision directly:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>We repeat, however, that the State does have an important and     legitimate interest in preserving and protecting the health of     the pregnant woman, whether she be a resident of the State or a     nonresident who seeks medical consultation and treatment there,     and that it has still another important and legitimate interest     in protecting the potentiality of human life.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>If, as <em>Roe<\/em> clearly states, &#8220;the State does have an   important and legitimate interest in preserving and protecting   the <strong>health<\/strong> [emphasis mine] of the pregnant   woman&#8221; &#8212; why doesn&#8217;t it have &#8220;an important and legitimate   interest&#8221; in protecting the health of the rest us?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The article goes on to point out that the fundamental premise behind universal health care is that the government could be deciding who gets what medical care thus taking the decision-making process out of the hands of the patient and putting into the hands of bureaucrats. If that&#8217;s so, you can be sure that abortion advocates will be at odds with those who want a single-payor health system.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>At least according to this article in The American Spectator, the answer is yes: Stated or unstated, a driving force behind modern liberalism takes root in the 1973 Supreme Court decision Roe v. Wade, in which abortion was legalized. The Court found a &#8220;right to privacy&#8221; guaranteed by the due process clause of the 14th [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,14,43,12],"tags":[1033,277,278,276],"class_list":["post-2001","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-abortion","category-culture","category-medicine","category-tom","tag-abortion","tag-obamacare","tag-roe-v-wade","tag-universal-health-care"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stonescryout.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2001","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stonescryout.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stonescryout.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stonescryout.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stonescryout.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2001"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stonescryout.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2001\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stonescryout.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2001"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stonescryout.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2001"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stonescryout.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2001"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}