{"id":2090,"date":"2009-07-28T09:56:21","date_gmt":"2009-07-28T13:56:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stonescryout.org\/?p=2090"},"modified":"2009-07-28T09:56:21","modified_gmt":"2009-07-28T13:56:21","slug":"liberal-climate-logic","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stonescryout.org\/?p=2090","title":{"rendered":"Liberal Climate Logic"},"content":{"rendered":"

Mr DeLong points to a plot that the anthropogenic global warming proponents are pushing<\/a>. He’s also pointed to a big “inflection point” of industrialization and its economic effects in his pdf on “slouching toward utopia”. One wonders if he can put two and two together and get four … and connect the two. It seems if<\/em> you believe anthropogenic global warming began at the same time as industrialization … the obvious conclusion is that to “restore” the climate the industrial revolution has to be renounced. All<\/em> the factories, power plants, cars and all have to be forgone. A return to the pre-industrial age is a necessity. One wonder if he really wants to do that. My guess is … no. But if you believe the first and the second is clearly in that chain of logic causally connected then the conclusion seems inescapable. To paraphrase Mr DeLong, “How can any person who believes in anthropogenic global warming participate in a non-agrarian non-carbon neutral non-self-sustaining lifestyle?” It seems clear if you are blogging<\/em> about global warming you are a hypocrite and a willing contributor to the problem. Since the conclusion that pre-industrial population levels is inescapable for the true anthropogenic global warming believer for us to have a reasonable chance of returning to pre-1850\/1870 carbon output. Killing off 6 billion or so people, now that will truly take a real far thinking progressive mentality.<\/p>\n

Of course this leads to the same problem as the one facing Mr Obama and his nuclear weapon-free world pipe dream. How do you disarm if there are bad men in the world. The same is true for industrial capacity. How can you disarm your factories and your multi-trillion dollar economy if the other guy doesn’t do it as well? Oh, wait … you can’t.<\/p>\n

And because you cannot, there is of course only one way out of this problem … and it is that we need an alternative source of power, of which right now there is only one<\/em>. Nuclear (fission) power is the only viable alternative to coal and oil based power generation with our current levels of power consumption. And … oddly enough nobody on the left is talking about that. Oddly enough as well, Gen-IV reactor designs are almost have nothing in common with those of the Rickover water cooled variety.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Mr DeLong points to a plot that the anthropogenic global warming proponents are pushing. He’s also pointed to a big “inflection point” of industrialization and its economic effects in his pdf on “slouching toward utopia”. One wonders if he can put two and two together and get four … and connect the two. It seems […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[63,16,17,58],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2090","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-energy","category-environment","category-global-warming","category-marko"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t