{"id":2707,"date":"2009-12-21T08:11:00","date_gmt":"2009-12-21T13:11:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stonescryout.org\/?p=2707"},"modified":"2009-12-21T08:11:00","modified_gmt":"2009-12-21T13:11:00","slug":"my-two-krugmans","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stonescryout.org\/?p=2707","title":{"rendered":"My Two Krugmans"},"content":{"rendered":"

That was then…<\/p>\n

\n

"The big step by extremists will be an attempt to eliminate the filibuster."–former Enron adviser Paul Krugman, New York Times, March 29, 2005<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

…and this is now.<\/p>\n

\n

"We need to take on the way the Senate works. The filibuster, and the need for 60 votes to end debate, aren’t in the Constitution. . . . So it’s time to revise the rules."–former Enron adviser Krugman, New York Times, Dec. 18, 2009<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Which James Taranto labels<\/a> "his first-ever accurate prediction."  I’d call it evidence of how heavy a role politics plays into Krugman’s thoughts on economics.  He’s more political pundit than economist.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

That was then… "The big step by extremists will be an attempt to eliminate the filibuster."–former Enron adviser Paul Krugman, New York Times, March 29, 2005 …and this is now. "We need to take on the way the Senate works. The filibuster, and the need for 60 votes to end debate, aren’t in the Constitution. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9,15,26],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2707","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-doug","category-economics-taxes","category-politics"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t