{"id":2984,"date":"2010-02-24T09:05:48","date_gmt":"2010-02-24T14:05:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stonescryout.org\/?p=2984"},"modified":"2010-02-24T09:05:09","modified_gmt":"2010-02-24T14:05:09","slug":"same-sex-marriage-a-question","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stonescryout.org\/?p=2984","title":{"rendered":"Same Sex Marriage: A Question"},"content":{"rendered":"

I’d like to pose a question to any out there who might support SSM. Allow me a moment to set the question up with some numbers.<\/p>\n

The percentage of the population, based on a John Fund essay some years ago which I’m not going to dig up for y’all, offered that if finds that upwards 6% of the population are gay then in Canada, where SSM was legalized, then it was observed that about 6% of that gay population was availing itself of the opportunity to get married. This means that the SSM question affects just under .4% of the population. Conversely 94% of the population is not gay, and a considerably higher proportion of that population does get married. Within that larger set, a certain number of the marriages are “weak”, that is have significant difficulties in staying hitched. Today’s high divorce rate is a symptom of that fact. <\/p>\n

Marriage itself is a institution and a practice which involves many things, including the relational aspect between the two individuals, the community, and immediate and extended family (that is kids). The arguments for SSM stress the first as being the primary aspect, i.e., that marriage is primarily a bond between two people in a loving and nurturing relationship. This argument consequentially reduces the emphasis on the other aspects of marriage. For the “weak” marriages above that in turn improves the chance of those marriages breaking up, because if marriage is “about” relationship and the relationship is sour or lost, then there is no point in continuing. <\/p>\n

So here’s my question: If SSM were enacted, say federally, it seems quite plausible that the number of SSM marriage partners is roughly commensurate with increase in the number of children from broken families due to a new emphasis on the partner aspect of marriage. So, for argument, grant that these numbers are about the same, that is the number of people in new gay marriages is equal to the number of children abandoned to state care. If that were the case, would legalizing SSM still be the right thing to do? <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

I’d like to pose a question to any out there who might support SSM. Allow me a moment to set the question up with some numbers. The percentage of the population, based on a John Fund essay some years ago which I’m not going to dig up for y’all, offered that if finds that upwards […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13,14,21,58],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2984","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-conservative","category-culture","category-liberal","category-marko"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t