{"id":4501,"date":"2011-08-10T10:34:00","date_gmt":"2011-08-10T15:34:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stonescryout.org\/?p=4501"},"modified":"2011-08-10T10:34:00","modified_gmt":"2011-08-10T15:34:00","slug":"the-anti-war-left","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stonescryout.org\/?p=4501","title":{"rendered":"The &quot;Anti-War&quot; Left"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Things have been extremely quite from the supposedly &quot;anti-war&quot; Left ever since Obama sat down in the Oval Office. Protests over Afghanistan and Iraq evaporated. One could say that they were already too far under way to stop quickly, and thus it&#8217;s of little use now to protest. OK, but that doesn&#8217;t explain the silence over Libya. One person exhibiting what seems really to have been an anti-Bush sentiment, rather than some moral concern over war, is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2011\/08\/07\/opinion\/sunday\/harold-kohs-flip-flop-on-the-libya-question.html?ref=opinion&amp;pagewanted=all\" target=\"_blank\">Harold Koh<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>HAROLD HONGJU KOH, the former dean of the Yale Law School, has been one of the country\u2019s foremost defenders of the notion that the president of the United States can\u2019t wage wars without the approval of Congress. During the Bush administration, he was legendary for his piercing criticisms of \u201cexecutive muscle flexing\u201d in the White House\u2019s pursuit of the so-called war on terror. <\/p>\n<p>Even more, he was described by those who knew him as the inspiration for a generation of human rights activists and lawyers passionately committed to a vision of a post-imperial America as a model of constitutional restraint. His colleagues viewed him as not only a brilliant scholar but a \u201cliberal icon.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>Suddenly, though, Mr. Koh seems to be a different person. <\/p>\n<p>Just over two years ago, he became legal adviser to Hillary Rodham Clinton\u2019s State Department, and in that job, he has become the administration\u2019s defender of the right to stay engaged in a conflict against Libya without Congressional approval. He argues that the president can proceed because the country is not actually engaging in \u201chostilities.\u201d Because \u201chostilities\u201d is \u201can ambiguous standard,\u201d he has argued, the president need not withdraw forces to meet the resolution\u2019s requirement of an automatic pull-out, 60 days after \u201chostilities\u201d begin, absent express Congressional approval for the war. The conflict is in its fourth month, and no such consent has been given. <\/p>\n<p>Mr. Koh\u2019s allies, speaking more in sorrow than in anger, are mystified and disheartened to see their hero engaging in legalistic \u201cword play.\u201d To them, it\u2019s as if he has torn off his team jersey, midgame, and put on the other side\u2019s. Mary Ellen O\u2019Connell, a Notre Dame law professor who has known Mr. Koh for a quarter-century, is seeking an answer to this question: \u201cWhere is the Harold Koh I worked with to ensure that international law, human rights and the Constitution were honored during the Bush years?\u201d <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>He&#8217;s probably in the same place he always was; playing partisan politics to his party&#8217;s advantage, and making use of anyone blind enough to believe what he&#8217;s selling.<\/p>\n<p>But Mr. Koh surely doesn&#8217;t run the anti-war movement. They could be out in the streets at any time of their own accord, being true to principle over politics. That they are <em>not<\/em> speaks volumes about their real intentions.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Things have been extremely quite from the supposedly &quot;anti-war&quot; Left ever since Obama sat down in the Oval Office. Protests over Afghanistan and Iraq evaporated. One could say that they were already too far under way to stop quickly, and thus it&#8217;s of little use now to protest. OK, but that doesn&#8217;t explain the silence [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,9,26,49],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4501","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-democrats","category-doug","category-politics","category-war"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stonescryout.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4501","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stonescryout.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stonescryout.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stonescryout.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stonescryout.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4501"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stonescryout.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4501\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stonescryout.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4501"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stonescryout.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4501"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stonescryout.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4501"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}