{"id":501,"date":"2008-08-15T10:10:58","date_gmt":"2008-08-15T14:10:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stonescryout.org\/?p=501"},"modified":"2008-08-15T10:29:56","modified_gmt":"2008-08-15T14:29:56","slug":"on-the-lameness-of-fortune-telling-bush-mccain-obama-georgia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stonescryout.org\/?p=501","title":{"rendered":"On the Lameness of Fortune-telling:  Bush, McCain, Obama &#038; Georgia"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Regarding the recent invasion of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2008\/POLITICS\/08\/15\/us.russia\/\" target=\"_blank\">Russian forces<\/a> into Georgia, <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/crunchycon\/2008\/08\/what-if-bush-had-gotten-his-wa.html\" target=\"_blank\">Rod Dreher<\/a> links to <a href=\"http:\/\/slate.com\/id\/2197281\" target=\"_blank\">Fred Kaplan<\/a>. Kaplan states,<\/p>\n<blockquote><p> Bush pressed the other NATO powers to place Georgia&#8217;s application for membership on the fast track. The Europeans rejected the idea, understanding the geo-strategic implications of pushing NATO&#8217;s boundaries right up to Russia&#8217;s border. If the Europeans had let Bush have his way, we would now be obligated by treaty to send troops in Georgia&#8217;s defense. That is to say, we would now be in a shooting war with the Russians. Those who might oppose entering such a war would be accused of &#8220;weakening our credibility&#8221; and &#8220;destroying the unity of the Western alliance.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Dreher states,<\/p>\n<blockquote><p> To be fair, refusing to defend a NATO country that had come under attack would weaken the credibility of the alliance. But of course it would be insane to get into a shooting war with Russia &#8212; which still has nuclear weapons &#8212; to defend Georgia. This is why Bush had no business leading the Georgians on with this kind of crazy talk&#8230;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>As repellent as I find the prospect of an Obama presidency, the idea of hotheaded John McCain sitting in the Oval Office now trying to figure out how to deal with a newly aggressive Russia makes me extremely nervous &#8212; this, to the extent that a McCain administration, on national security and foreign policy, represents a third Bush term.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Maybe Dreher and Kaplan should spray some Windex on their crystal balls.<\/p>\n<p>The way I see it, the Russians not only see us as resource-stretched (and rightly so), what with our commitments to Afghanistan and Iraq, but they also see a lame-duck president.<\/p>\n<p>More importantly, however, I think that they view the American people&#8217;s will as weak, and that their own fortune-tellers are envisioning an upcoming administration chock-full of platitudes, yet devoid of substance.<\/p>\n<p>Notice that many of the complaints and criticisms of the way we&#8217;re handling the global war on terror link back to 20th century modes of thinking. Comparisons are made to Vietnam, the Cold War, NATO, etc. The problem is, we aren&#8217;t living in the 20th century. There is no Soviet Bloc, we aren&#8217;t on the verge of nuclear annihilation and, for the most part, we aren&#8217;t facing an enemy clothed in identifiable uniforms.<\/p>\n<p>In <em><a href=\"http:\/\/counterterrorismblog.org\/2008\/08\/rethinking_russia_on_terrorism.php\" target=\"_blank\">Rethinking Russia on Terrorism Issues<\/a><\/em>, Douglas Farah states,<\/p>\n<blockquote><p> &#8230;Russia is set on selling weapons to those who want very badly to hurt us, and who buy their weapons with the stated purpose of using them for that.<\/p>\n<p>Everyone sells weapons, and yes, the United States plays in the game. But Russia&#8217;s willingness to arm non-state actors and states that are facing international sanction is qualitatively different.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>This is the world we face, in the 21st century.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Regarding the recent invasion of Russian forces into Georgia, Rod Dreher links to Fred Kaplan. Kaplan states, Bush pressed the other NATO powers to place Georgia&#8217;s application for membership on the fast track. The Europeans rejected the idea, understanding the geo-strategic implications of pushing NATO&#8217;s boundaries right up to Russia&#8217;s border. If the Europeans had [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[61,45,59,49],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-501","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-military","category-russia","category-rusty","category-war"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stonescryout.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/501","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stonescryout.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stonescryout.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stonescryout.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stonescryout.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=501"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stonescryout.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/501\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stonescryout.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=501"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stonescryout.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=501"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stonescryout.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=501"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}