{"id":6165,"date":"2014-02-06T12:02:00","date_gmt":"2014-02-06T17:02:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stonescryout.org\/?p=6165"},"modified":"2014-02-05T11:04:08","modified_gmt":"2014-02-05T16:04:08","slug":"live-by-the-cbo-die-by-the-cbo","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stonescryout.org\/?p=6165","title":{"rendered":"Live By the CBO, Die By the CBO"},"content":{"rendered":"

Dana Milbank explains that the Congressional Budget Office issued glowing reports years ago about how ObamaCare was going to save money. The Obama administration trumpeted those findings far and wide. I noted at the time<\/a> that the system was gamed because the administration knows the rules by which the CBO comes up with estimates, and wrote the bill to get the best looking numbers at the start. It wouldn’t matter that later estimates would be worse; it would have already been sold to the American people.<\/p>\n

But now, things are looking much worse.<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

The congressional number-crunchers, perhaps the capital\u2019s closest thing to a neutral referee, came out with a new report Tuesday, and it wasn\u2019t pretty for Obamacare. The CBO predicted the law would have a \u201csubstantially larger\u201d impact on the labor market than it had previously expected: The law would reduce the workforce in 2021 by the equivalent of 2.3 million full-time workers, well more than the 800,000 originally anticipated. This will inevitably be a drag on economic growth, as more people decide government handouts are more attractive than working more and paying higher taxes.<\/p>\n

This is grim news for the White House and for Democrats on the ballot in November. This independent arbiter, long embraced by the White House, has validated a core complaint of the Affordable Care Act\u2019s (ACA) critics: that it will discourage work and become an ungainly entitlement. Disputing Republicans\u2019 charges is much easier than refuting the federal government\u2019s official scorekeepers.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

The President’s spokesman, Jay Carney, tried to spin it as people who would "spend more time with their family", or perhaps become entrepreneurs. The latter guess is just that; a guess trying to make it sound wonderful. The former is a euphemism for living off the dole because the benefits are better.<\/p>\n

Carney noted that these were "personal choices", but he conveniently neglects to mention that they are personal choices spurred on by the government. People respond to incentives; that’s why things like tax deductions work the way they do. ObamaCare is pushing people to dependency.<\/p>\n

The CBO numbers prove it.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Dana Milbank explains that the Congressional Budget Office issued glowing reports years ago about how ObamaCare was going to save money. The Obama administration trumpeted those findings far and wide. I noted at the time that the system was gamed because the administration knows the rules by which the CBO comes up with estimates, and […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,9,15,18,275],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6165","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-culture","category-doug","category-economics-taxes","category-government","category-healthcare"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t