{"id":854,"date":"2008-10-08T12:25:07","date_gmt":"2008-10-08T16:25:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stonescryout.org\/?p=854"},"modified":"2008-10-08T12:25:07","modified_gmt":"2008-10-08T16:25:07","slug":"the-yawn-second-presidential-debate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stonescryout.org\/?p=854","title":{"rendered":"The *yawn* Second Presidential Debate"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Short impression of the 2nd Presidential Debate:&#160; Just like the 1st Presidential Debate, but with more walking around.<\/p>\n<p>Not much new ground covered in this debate, even though there was ample opportunity for it.&#160; The questions just teed up the candidates for the same stump speech excerpts we heard last time.&#160; As such, Obama comes out of the debate in the driver&#8217;s seat since the pressure for a game changer was on McCain.&#160; <\/p>\n<p>A few notes:<\/p>\n<p>Obama continued to lie about what brought about this financial crisis.&#160; The wheels did <em>not<\/em> magically start to come off the day George W. Bush sat down in the Oval Office chair, and the party-line votes regarding Fannie and Freddie put the <em>Democrats<\/em> on the side against regulation of those institutions.&#160; Even Bill Clinton has debunked this line.&#160; That John McCain didn&#8217;t even bother to set the record straight on this is a huge missed opportunity, moreso because it was a carbon copy of Obama&#8217;s line in the first debate.<\/p>\n<p>If I hear the phrase &quot;fundamental difference&quot; one more time, I&#8217;ll scream.<\/p>\n<p>One bit of new ground that was actually covered was McCain&#8217;s 300 billion dollar bailout of people who bought more home than they could afford.&#160; I was extremely disappointed in this.&#160; As I said recently, huge federal debt is not the way to fix a problem that is debt-related.&#160; This is a further example of how our politicians have been conditioned to go after votes by offering giveaways <em>because we respond to giveaways<\/em>.&#160; McCain&#8217;s obviously looking to curry favor with those who think the government should protect people from the consequences of their decisions.&#160; This makes as much fiscal sense as allowing me to refinance my car every year at its new, lower value.&#160; No, I incurred a debt that I am morally obligated to pay.&#160; This is another example of the faux &quot;fairness&quot; and class warfare our country has come to accept to a large extent.&#160; <\/p>\n<p>What about illegal immigration?&#160; What about abortion?&#160; What about judicial appointments?&#160; What about a host of other issues that haven&#8217;t been touched on in 2 debates?&#160; Mr. Brokaw, you fell down on the job.<\/p>\n<p>If health care is a &quot;right&quot;, Mr. Obama, is food now a right as well?&#160; Which is more important; food that you need every day or health care you need once in a while?&#160; <\/p>\n<p>John, John, John&#8230;don&#8217;t crack jokes.&#160; They really didn&#8217;t work.<\/p>\n<p>Obama is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=kDnbVr3283o\" target=\"_blank\">suddenly for nuclear power<\/a>?&#160; I&#8217;m sure there were some environmentalist supporters of his who spewed coffee out their noses at that.<\/p>\n<p>Anyway, so much for another debate.&#160; Not very notable, and mostly a rehash.&#160; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Short impression of the 2nd Presidential Debate:&#160; Just like the 1st Presidential Debate, but with more walking around. Not much new ground covered in this debate, even though there was ample opportunity for it.&#160; The questions just teed up the candidates for the same stump speech excerpts we heard last time.&#160; As such, Obama comes [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9,15,63,18],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-854","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-doug","category-economics-taxes","category-energy","category-government"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stonescryout.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/854","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stonescryout.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stonescryout.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stonescryout.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stonescryout.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=854"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stonescryout.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/854\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stonescryout.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=854"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stonescryout.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=854"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stonescryout.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=854"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}