On a non-religious Christmas
Earlier this month, the New York Times ran a piece on the slant of the White House’ Christmas decor. From the Times,
But Washington is a city that likes its traditions, and Ms. Rogers has raised a few eyebrows by trying to bend them. When former social secretaries gave a luncheon to welcome Ms. Rogers earlier this year, one participant said, she surprised them by suggesting the Obamas were planning a “non-religious Christmas” — hardly a surprising idea for an administration making a special effort to reach out to other faiths.
A “non-religious Christmas”? Wouldn’t that be like having a Red Sox celebration in the middle of New York City? Hmmm. From FreeDictionary.com, we have, for the word “Christmas”,
1. A Christian feast commemorating the birth of Jesus.
2. December 25, the day on which this feast is celebrated.
[Middle English Cristemas, from Old English Cristes mæsse, Christ’s festival : Christ; see Christ + mæsse, festival; see Mass.]
Christian? Birth of Jesus? Christ? Mass? Certainly seems to be a whole lotta religion going on there.
Well, it seems that Desiree Rogers wasn’t kidding as, per Breitbart, none other than Chairman Mao made it onto a White House Christmas Holiday Tree (as an ornament). And, to top it off (the story, not the tree), the Obama family will not be attending church this Christmas Eve or Christmas Day.
Change… you can believe in.
Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!