The scientific method is taught and portrayed as a dispassionate rational dialectic between theory and experiment. Theories are propose, data is collected which forces refinement of theory and that continues. Occasionally, ala Mr Kuhn, a revolution occurs in which a major paradigm shift takes over and a radically new theory becomes ascendant. 

Alas, this has little to no relation to what actually occurs within science. Scientists are not dispassionate men judging between different competing theories analyzing experimental data to that end. They are instead emotional advocates of a particular theory which they espouse a theory which they find, well, beautiful (for a variety of reasons). Now, the reason we have success and progress in science is that the training and process of learning their particular specialty has programmed their emotional responses to align their aesthetic principles with the rigors of their discipline. 

to be continued … 

Related posts:

  1. Of the CRU Kerfuffle and Science
  2. On Science and Method
  3. On Science and Religion
  4. Religion, Meaning, and Science
  5. Science and Religion: a (very) preliminary draft

Filed under: Mark O. • Science

Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!