Fasting: Left and Right
I was recently reading about some protesters fasting in order to raise awareness for one cause or another.
It struck me that the secular left and the religious right have very different notions about fasting and its means and purpose.
Fasting for me and the tradition in which I am a member (Christian Orthodoxy) fasting is a constant thing throughout the year. More than a third of the year is devoting to fasting. Fasting itself is a way both develop spiritual discipline, apatheia, and to remind ourselves that this life and world are not the important thing. It is to help us turn ourselves and our attentions toward God. There are two modes of fasting, one fasts by restricting (or eliminating) food intake and the other is by restricting dietary choices. Public attention to this fasting is contrary to humility and is at cross purposes with why one is fasting and is, as much as is possible, to be avoided. I would add, I’m not particularly good at fasting, but … I’m working at it and I think I’m improving.
When the left fasts, it is more often to gain public notoriety to a cause. It is interesting to note that the first reaction of one who fasts for inner reasons to one engaging in public fasting … the impulses don’t match. There is confusion, why public? There is the response to encourage the other. Fasting is good for you. How does that connect with protest is harder to see. The only impulse that does make sense regarding the protest fast seems kind of childish. A slightly slower and more drawn out response that spoiled tot who threatens to “hold his breath” until he gets his way.
I leave you with this, quoted from today’s synaxarion:
The Monk John the Tent-Dweller was the son of rich and illustrious parents living in Constantinople during the V Century, and he received a fine education. He loved to read spiritual books, and having perceived the vanity of secular life, he preferred “rather than the broad path one that was narrow and infirm and extremely rigorous”. Having persuaded his parents to give him a Gospel, he set out secretly to Bithynia. At the monastery “Unceasing Vigilance” he received monastic tonsure. The young monk began to asceticise with zeal, astonishing his brethren with unceasing prayer, humble obedience, strict abstinence and perseverance at work.
After six years he began to undergo temptations: thoughts about his parents, about their love and fondness, about their sorrow — all this began to overtake the young ascetic.
Saint John disclosed his situation to the hegumen and he asked to be released from the monastery, and he besought the brethren not to forget him in their prayers, hoping that by their prayers he would with the help of God, both see his parents and overcome the snares of the devil. The hegumen gave him his blessing.
Saint John returned to Constantinople in the clothes of a beggar, and known to no one. He settled at the gates of his parental home. The parents sent him food from their table, for the sake of Christ. For three years, oppressed and insulted, he lived in a tent (hut), enduring cold and frost, unceasingly conversing with the Lord and the holy Angels. Always with him was the Gospel, given him by his parents, and from which he unceasingly gathered out sayings of life eternal. Before his death the Lord appeared in a vision to the monk, revealing that the end of his sorrows was approaching and that after three days he would be taken up into the Heavenly Kingdom.
Only then did the saint show his parents the Gospel, which they had given him shortly before he had left his parental home. The parents recognised their son. With tears of joy they hugged him simultaneously with tears of sorrow, in that he had endured privation for so long at the very gates of his parental home. Saint John gave final instructions to his parents to bury him on the spot where stood his tent, and to put in the grave the beggar’s rags that he wore during life.
The saint died in the mid V Century, when he was not yet 25 years of age. On the place of his burial the parents built a church to God and alongside it an house of hospitality for strangers. In the XII Century the head of the saint was taken by Crusaders to Besacon (in France), and the other relics of the saint were taken to Rome.
If you encourage or empathize with protest fasting, how does the above martyrdom story strike you?
Filed under: Christianity • Conservative • Liberal • Mark O. • Orthodox • Religion
Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!
I find it a bit puzzling, as I’m not sure what it has to do with “left” and “right”.
What about the religious left and the secular right, for example?
How does fasting affect them?
Steve,
Well, perhaps a member of the religious left reading this can offer his opinion on how fasting and his views on that affect his view of publicized fasting-as-protest.
I couldn’t think of “right wing fasting” so I’m putting fasting as political theater in the panoply of left-wing tactics. Do you disagree?