So, minors can’t be given a life sentence. A kid under 18 commits a completely heinous and extensive serious of assaults and he’s by law now going to be out again at some point? Do you think that’s a good idea?  He just has to “not kill” his victims, say he “just” rapes girls and amputates their arms and legs. Still think he shouldn’t get a life sentence? Is that a useful or meaningful restriction? 

Related posts:

  1. President Obama Overexposed?
  2. A Closer Look at the ObamaCare Supreme Court Ruling
  3. On Climate … Two Questions
  4. A Trend in Obama SCOTUS Nominees?
  5. A Capital Question

Filed under: Ethics & Morality • Government • Judiciary • Mark O.

Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!