Thing Heard: e160v5
Friday, February 11th, 2011 at
10:01 am
Good morning. Interrogative day at link central. 😀
- Money lost, is that stimulatory?
- Liberation or conquest?
- Zoom or huff-puff?
- How to control costs in healthcare?
- Who didn’t expect this? After all while there is consensus that spending should be cut there hasn’t been any consensus on what to cut. It’s why the Left’s “plan”, raising taxes is more feasible (even though raising taxes as a method of addressing deficits doesn’t actually work) is what will likely win. There’s no consensus required to just tax more. To bad the easy solution is the one that doesn’t work in this case.
- Why oh why will the anthropogenic climate people not read stuff like this? I would call attention to the study of weather data for the last 140 years … noting “So we were surprised that none of the three major indices of climate variability that we used show a trend of increased circulation going back to 1871.” You know the recent (Krugman!) notes about increased storms and droughts. All confirmation bias. Ooops.
- Is this a statement that the Palin haters would get on board with?
- Is this not exactly to the point?
- So what eactly is solertia and eustochia?
- Is this a sign of our decline?
- How to find a path between progress and history?
- Abortion is here. How about that back alley?
- Speaking of abortion, is this useful? At least he’s not bringing up the regrettable Violinist thang.
Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!
Regardless of its stance on abortion (which is legal), PP provides many other essential health care opportunities for people who could not otherwise afford them. But you seem to view PP through a very narrow lens dictated by your personal ideology, which appears to be very Machiavellian. No matter what your opinion about abortion, it’s despicable to link to an article that claims that the organization aids and abets child prostitution. The facts are that attempts were made to entrap many PP employees, who reported the behavior of the fake pimps to the FBI. One of many of these employees violated PP policy and was fired. So the organization acted correctly. You have misrepresented it due to ideological differences. You are not a true Christian. You should be ashamed of yourself.
You’re believing PP’s cover story. What I find most interesting is that PP is asking the FBI to look into the sting rather than into their employees who fed all sorts of information to a supposed pimp. If nothing was wrong, if their employees did everything right, why are they insisting on retraining for them?
No matter what your opinion about abortion, it’s despicable to enable sex traffickers.