Links Archives

A couple of Sunday links

Remember my post noting how some Pharmacists now carry weapons to protect themselves from drug addicts holding them up for oxycontin? Well, in Long Island we have a story of 4 people (2 employees and 2 customers) being shot dead in a Pharmacy hold up. The alleged shooter (and his wife) has been found and arrested. From ABC News,

Drug stores are now equipping themselves with surveillance cameras to protect themselves from possible break-ins.

Seriously? All I have to do to protect my household from a possible break-in is install a surveillance camera?

###

Remember my post noting how TSA is keeping us all safer by patting-down 5 year-old girls and 80 year-old grandmothers? Well, besides letting the identity-thief stowaway get a free ride, it seems that the TSA also has an inability to keep checked firearms from getting stolen.

Rusty Nails (SCO v. 37)

Of course there are .22 caliber shotguns! The internet told me so.
A couple of years ago I overheard a recent college grad, at work, exclaim to a colleague, “What did they do before there was Google?” It seems they were searching for some elusive answer to an inquiry they had. Now, I’ll be the first to admit that I use the internet for a variety of searches, typically those involving how to get a piece of software/hardware to do what it is supposed to do. However, a good dose of incredulity is in order whenever one reads a search result on the internet. Especially from an “ehow” type site.

Case in point is the article Do You Need a Gun License for a .22 Caliber?, over at said eHow. From the article, in response to the question “What is a .22 caliber”?,

There are many types of guns that use this size ammunition; these guns include revolvers, rifles, pistols and shotguns.

Hmmm. While I suppose it is possible to build a .22 shotgun, it seems to be pretty much a one-off.

Also,

To own a .22 caliber, it is necessary to complete a Federal Firearms License application.

Well… you purchase a firearm (regardless of whether it’s a .22) through an FFL dealer.

And,

You must submit this form to the AFT (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives.)

C’mon. AFT? Try ATF (which kind of corresponds to Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms).

###

Them Homeschoolers are always kept at home… except when they’re winning stuff

###

Amazing Milky Way Timelapse

Plains Milky Way from Randy Halverson on Vimeo.

###

Rep. King Calls Out TSA on Security Breach
Of course, this now means that TSA will step-up pat-downs of 5 year-old girls, 90 year-olds in walkers, armed forces personnel, and nuns.

###

Facebook Tip for Parents
Did you know you can submit an underage report for your kid if they’ve signed up to FB and are under age 13?

Things Heard: e179v4

Good day.

  1. Well, that kind of overconfidence is something I don’t have to worry about.
  2. Kinda shadenfroody … Let’s see it take $250k just to jump regulatory burdens in CA to open a hamburger joint, companies that want to startup building cars go to 3 wheels to avoid the high costs of regulation (see Aptera), and so on. All Democrat inspired regulatory burdens that are mostly useless, expensive and hampering real progress. But go ahead, get pissed if it applies to your pet projects. 
  3. Manufacturing and myths.
  4. That health mandate ruling, an objective (non ideological) description.
  5. I don’t get Engaget’s bias here. This is the umpteenth Android tablet they’ve noted “on parity in price” with this and that … but forgetting to mention it’s $100 more than the Asus Transformer? Why the omission? It a anti-Taiwan bias?
  6. Speaking of ID and evolution.
  7. History as a Lawyer is different than not (a lawyer). Specifically a non-Lawyer looks at the Jackson legacy quite differently.
  8. Is that a good example for young girls with big dreams or big girls with young dreams?
  9. A reminder for our summer project … liberty and independence is not conceived as the maximization of choice but of communion in love.
  10. The unsung consequences (which no liberal will admit even afterwards) to Mr Walker’s school budget union fight.
  11. More unsung, the unnoticed consequences of that 4th circuit Obamacare-as-Constitional ruling.

Things Heard: e179v3

Traveling tonight, which might mean links tomorrow will be in the evening. 

  1. Lazy lawmakers. Who’d of thought such a thing could be possible? Washington not attending diligently to their primary job (making good law)? 
  2. Google and search bias.
  3. Commenting on a stupid move made by Mr Obama.
  4. No that’s a real non-news story (or should I more accurately coin it a news story for which news reporters are only audience). What “spotlight?”
  5. Cost and life. I’d say no. And the question might be what price you would find reasonable. My gut response is a few hundred bucks.
  6. Putting the “no soldiers in harms way means it isn’t war” in context.
  7. Why not in the US? Answer: regulations.
  8. “Are you a flake?” … here and here.
  9. Here’s the thing on the recent Afghan move from FP, “It’s clear that Obama and his advisors approach these decisions as politicians, not strategists.” That’s always a bad move in war. Here’s one who concurs.
  10. This is not unrelated.
  11. Speaking of war, cinema?
  12. LOL.
  13. What makes a man.
  14. Talking CO2.

Things Heard: e179v1

Good morning

  1. One of Orthodoxy’s key words, fullness.
  2. Not-sold-here, thanks to our regulatory barriers.
  3. I have difficulty imagining a good reason to get something like this.
  4. Slightly cute. Or is the word precious?
  5. Morning glory.
  6. Boy or girl.
  7. Hegel and a Pope.
  8. The mythical socialists (HT).
  9. What passes for the new government mandated tobacco ads in another venue.
  10. Browser wars.
  11. Ngrams … and a follow-up.

Things Heard: e179v1

Good morning.

  1. American exceptionalism, looking back.
  2. Big pharam and Madison ave.
  3. Mr Obama and the Afghan shift.
  4. What, kind sir, does “marry” mean anyhow?
  5. Orthodoxy and going against grain.
  6. Perhaps at the next Obama press conference or campaign stop, someone can ask him to defend this.
  7. That’s because those young people are raised by older people who by and large are also … True story. A few weeks ago when my parents visited, my mother claimed to have never heard of William the Conqueror or the significance of the date 1066. I’m still not sure I believe her.
  8. About those required graphics on cigarettes
  9. Fuel cell news.
  10. What is racism

Friday Link Wrap-up

Relative bias in the media vs actual bias. A new book from a UCLA political science professor demonstrate how, because the media is so generally slanted to the left, outlets like Fox appear more right-slanted, when in reality they’re far more centrist.

Rosalina Gonzales had pleaded guilty to a felony charge of injury to a child for what prosecutors had described as a "pretty simple, straightforward spanking case."

Trevor Phillips, chairman of Obama’s Equality and Human Rights Commission accused Christians, particularly evangelicals, of being more militant than Muslims in complaining about discrimination, arguing that many of the claims are motivated by a desire for greater political influence. Hmm, define "militant".

What if Charles Schultz had done cartoons of Doctor Who characters? The result would probably have looked like this.

"Smart" diplomacy; cozy up to dictators, snub our friends.

Democrats pilloried George W. Bush for "not listening to his generals" when he made decisions counter to the Pentagon. When Obama does it, not so much.

Would ID requirements for voting amount to a Jim-Crow-style poll tax on blacks? E. J. Dionne thinks so. James Taranto wonders if ID requirements for Amtrak, hotels, air travel and employment are equally as "racist"?

Nancy Pelosi said that they had to pass the bill before we could find out what’s in it. Apparently, some surprises are buried in there.

President Barack Obama’s health care law would let several million middle-class people get nearly free insurance meant for the poor, a twist government number crunchers say they discovered only after the complex bill was signed.

The change would affect early retirees: A married couple could have an annual income of about $64,000 and still get Medicaid, said officials who make long-range cost estimates for the Health and Human Services department.

Whenever there is a budget shortfall, taxes are always on the table. How about we take them off just this once?

Medicare spending is unsustainable, and the CBO itself admits that its tools for determine any consequences from Obamacare are flawed. Yeah, that should "fix" health care.

And finally, define "emergency" (click for a larger version):

Things Heard: e178v4

Good day.

  1. Cassandra was right.
  2. Double? But, hey, I hear all those “responsible” Democrats don’t want to cut spending after all. What does that word “responsible” mean anyhow?
  3. Unexpected. Surprised. Why do we keep hearing this term from our economic so-called experts. Does snake oil ring a bell?
  4. Decisively put.
  5. Short eyes?
  6. A trillion?
  7. Looking forward to that Turing-ish test.
  8. The future of photo-journalism?
  9. Here’s your local not-very-scary Tea Party. (HT)
  10. Gay rights victory in Wisconsin. Although I’d think it’s mostly a women’s rights thing.
  11. Speaking of gay rights, … is all the liberal wagging about gay rights just about this dog?

Things Heard: e178v2

Better late than never, eh? Actually, I started this in the morning (after traveling last night … I didn’t leave enough to make it to the job site with breakfast + shower + link collect and report). 

  1. Art forgetting beauty.
  2. Feel safer now?
  3. Not a land shark.
  4. A suggestion that malfeasance (or incompetence) was a strategy.
  5. Streeeettttchsh the chicken.
  6. I’m with the blogger on this, you run into a parked car, it’s your own damn fault.
  7. Uncertainty and hiring. Ya think?
  8. A homily for our times.
  9. Or … if you have a modern viewpoint on the worth of a vow taken.
  10. Some liberals claim that they hold the “reality position” due to the fact that the putative experts are mostly liberal … but when those experts keep making claims like this … well, reality bites.
  11. Art and autism.
  12. It’d be nice if our government said it too … and heck not just talked the talk, but y’now walked the walk. 
  13. If you find offense in that picture, you need take a sanity check.
  14. A link to a good post, and Krugman keeps his ideological blinders on.
  15. Attacking the straw man.
  16. Someday, yes, someday I’m going to be able to read past the first five sentences of one of Eli’s acerbic attacks and not run into something he says that isn’t flipping idiotic. Let me try to be specific, “Twice he describes something as “attractive,” surely an odd choice given that he means to discuss something fundamentally moral and not just a matter of mere taste.” Hello, there are whole schools of ethics which equate the beauty and the good and furthermore find that ethics boils down to choosing the good (or beautiful) and that what constitutes beauty is not “just a matter of taste” it depends on asthetics and a theory of the same, which has no a priori dependence on taste.

Things Heard: e178v1

Good morning.

  1. Of West and East (rites).
  2. Even if the supposition that if we’re just using dones it isn’t war … is it even true?
  3. One of the big reasons liberals and conservatives can’t talk. Liberals slam the door before the conversation starts, see?
  4. Politics and shark-jumping. My guess is that liberals would point to the Clinton impeachment. I’d point at the Bork/Thomas hearings as the point at which liberal serious engagement in politics and with those on the other side of the aisle left the building.
  5. Academic fudging.
  6. Public/private schools for the children of politicians.
  7. Selecting for dumb.
  8. Chrisitanity, salvation and the individual.
  9. Flip flops and the President? Say it ain’t so!
  10. A media member attempts to insult Ms Palin, fails.
  11. I read that story … probably 35+ years ago.
  12. Is it naive to think that this would end the struggle and now just move the boundary of said same struggle.
  13. Dangerous things for kids.
  14. Abortion and choice … and consequences.

Friday Link Wrap-up

The Dalai Lama calls himself a Marxist.

An "unexpectedly" we could do with down here. "Canada Jobless Rate Unexpectedly Declines in May to Its Lowest Since 2009" It’s down to 7.4 percent. We’re adding government jobs and they’re adding private sector jobs. Our dollar is getting weaker while theirs gets stronger. “Our economy has one of the best records in the area of job creation in comparison with other industrialized countries and this is why we will continue to keep our taxes low,” Prime Minister Stephen Harper told lawmakers on June 8. Lessons to be learned  here.

Obama finally figures out, "Shovel-ready was not as shovel-ready as we expected." Which is one big reason why the stimulus didn’t stimulate.

Civility Watch: “Good afternoon brothers and sisters. Welcome to Nazi Germany….Brothers and sisters, this is not going to be an easy fight,” he shrieked. “It took World War II to get rid of the last Adolf Hitler. It is going to take World War III to get rid of Adolf Christie. Are you ready for World War III?” Union leaders are setting the example in New Jersey.

Soaking the rich won’t work the way the Left intends. Historical tax rates vs actual receipts put the lie to the idea that raising rates will necessarily bring in more revenue.

When even actor Aston Kutcher comes to the aid of Sarah Palin, you know the media has gone way too far.

And speaking of which (click for a larger version):

Rusty Nails (SCO v. 36) – Graduate Edition

u no wat im sayin?
In We Don’t Need Know Education, Mike Adams laments the writing (and speaking) quality of today’s average university student.

I’m getting to be a crabby old man and I’m not even fifty. But working at a liberal university for eighteen years has taught me never to accept responsibility for my actions or my disposition. Instead I blame my most recent bad mood (the one I’m in right now) on a student who just asked me a question about the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case United States v. Leon, (1984). Wanting to know the holding, he asked if it meant “that the police can rely upon a search warrant they don’t reasonably no is invalid.” I almost told the student there was know way he was going to pass my course if he didn’t no the difference between “know” and “no.” But I just new I would get in trouble if I did.

Maybe I’m getting to be a crabby old man, and I’m already over fifty, but I don’t recall there being such a disparity between college-age adults and post-college adults when I was in university.

###

Experience without Reason results in empty pews
It’s become hip for Christian leaders to toss around the “80% [or substitute some other large value] of the kids in our youth groups will leave Christianity by the time they finish college” warning. Regardless of the actual number, most will agree that we live in a time when more people claim to have no belief (or religious affiliation) than ever before.

Brett Kunkle, at Stand to Reason, has a novel idea: Why not teach apologetics to our Christian youth before they leave for college? Yeah, I know, in an age of touchy-feely, Jesus-wants-to-have-a-personal-relationship-with-you Christianity, teaching hard-hitting material which causes one to exercise their brain is considered revolutionary.

To drive the point home, Brett will sometimes role-play as an atheist college professor and present his case to unsuspecting Christian high school students (see video below). Take the time to see how the youth do in defending their faith. How would the youth group in your church do?

###

I’m OK, You’re OK; but I can’t tie my shoes
From Jerry Weinberger,

I’ve been a professor of political philosophy in the political science department at Michigan State University for almost 40 years. I was chair of the department for four years. So I know a thing or two about the state of the student body…

…more and more of my students, and not just freshmen, can’t tie their own shoes. They lose syllabi and can’t follow simple instructions; they don’t get the right books; they e-mail me to ask when and where the final exam will be held (as if they didn’t know when they signed up and don’t know how to find out); they forget to bring blue books to exams; they make appointments and don’t keep them; and many never come to office hours at all, except perhaps on the day before an exam.

###

College is a waste of time
Some college students are finding the whole idea of dropping a wad (or, their parent’s wad) to be caged in for four years, inculcated in the ways of the world, to not be their style. Dale Stephens writes,

I left college two months ago because it rewards conformity rather than independence, competition rather than collaboration, regurgitation rather than learning and theory rather than application. Our creativity, innovation and curiosity are schooled out of us.

Interesting. He also mentions Daniel Pink’s book, A Whole New Mind: Why Right Brainers Will Rule the Future, which predicts a “free agent economy” in this new world economic order we’ve found ourselves in.

In a Michael Ellsberg article highlighting Stephens, we get a glimpse at the counter-cultural notion that young-adults (aka teenagers) are more than capable of entering the full-fledged “adult” world.

Usually when we hear the words “disruption” together with “teenagers,” we think of loud talking in movie theaters, playing clown in class, and other discipline problems.

But teenagers like Stephens are engaging forcefully in a very different—and more profitable—form of disruption: disruptive innovation, as first described in detail by Clayton Christensen in The Innovator’s Dilemma.

Instead of perpetuating the myth of adolescence, in which we train our young-adults to expect the years of 13 – 20+ to be years of unfettered FUN, why not task them with the responsibility of being productive members of society?

Yeah… I know. Where’s the fun in that?

Things Heard: e177v5

Good morning.

  1. Quibbles over some terms.
  2. Movements on Malta.
  3. US decline.
  4. Southern Baptists go to hell … in a topical sense.
  5. Links to the whole saga here.
  6. The Administration’s war powers response. It strikes me that there’s a double edged thing going on here. In the 80s, if I recall, war powers arguments were used by the Dems against Reagan in several contexts (Nicaragua?) which the GOP supported (and likely Mr Obama at the time opposed). So, for the left, why oppose that and not this and conversely for the right the similar argument holds.
  7. Oh, and here’s a pointed rebuttal to the point that the Libyan action isn’t one of war
  8. Van Gough interprets Tolkein.
  9. Jesus as that great insane moralizer. Wait … what!?
  10. He may have legal recourse … but that doesn’t mean he should avail himself of it. Should you avail yourself of laws you think are wrong but which are in your favor. 
  11. Pah. The ultimate goal of “bike culture” was aptly stated by Freddy Mercury … “Get on your bike an ride!” And that’s the beginning and end of it.
  12. I’m not an Apple fan … but here’s a defense against the lastest salvo against them.
  13. Empathy, a typical Democrat meme, turned against our not-clearly-empathic President.
  14. Rape and war, kind of like the “it’s for the children” tax and spend refrain.

Things Heard: e177v2

Good morning.

  1. Capture and regulation by the dynamic duo, here and here.
  2. Why do “history related gaffes weigh heavily” on these and similar gaffes by, say, the President
  3. This reminds me of a homily by Isaac the Syrian which praised the passions (which are usually put in a negative light).
  4. Visiting with our rusty philosophe. First,  uhm, what is “1”? It’s a little more complicated than you suspect. One good exercise at an attempt to construct the Integers is found here, but don’t pretend it’s cut and dried or corresponding to your naive notions. And here, the little assertion (on which so much contends) that sexual acts are not intrinsically moral but “depend on context”. Whether killing a person is ethical depends on context. However, killing even if you determine it was ethical remains a moral act. So too with sex. It is intrinsically moral.
  5. The Lebonese reaction to the discovery of the idenity of “Gay Girl”.
  6. So, what does tending cows mean? Besides that the person using that phrase has never worked with cows.
  7. More Democrat stupidity, proving mostly that the Democrat elite at least have been relatively untouched by the recession.
  8. 99% perspiration.
  9. A categorization of Frank-Dodd for the books.
  10. Remember when Obamacare was market driven?

Things Heard: e177v1

Good morning.

  1. Talking death panels.
  2. Europe and stability.
  3. Freedom and the 50 states.
  4. Or Freedom and the Democratic party.
  5. Speaking of freedom. Here’s one more we’re losing soon.
  6. Racism or not? Would it have been decried loudly as such if the speaker was aligned with the GOP?
  7. On Mr Gates rant and NATO.
  8. US Bond ratings.
  9. No no no, the real crime is cycling without wearing cleats.
  10. TARP II
  11. Big media, when you’ve lost the Hollywood air-heads … 
  12. Color me unsurprised.
  13. On QE2, was it a mistake?
  14. He’s right, there are no facts at all without theory, which always predates and defines which datum are interesting.
  15. Contradictions or not?
  16. True or not, why the heck would you want to go public with that?
 Page 42 of 101  « First  ... « 40  41  42  43  44 » ...  Last »