Monday, September 30th, 2013 at 8:32 pm
So … government shuts down tomorrow … my prediction is few will notice.
- Seeing small things.
- Leaks.
- Unimpressed by the hostage/terror rhetoric coming from the left.
- Fer your book inbox.
- And cinema!
- The standard model and a small crack. Perhaps.
- I’m not getting it. Let’s see, abortion makes women “equal to men” in that that can walk away from pregnancy. A man walking away is horrible. How is making it the same for women a good idea by permitting her to kill her child a necessary right?
- Fear and anger. That’s akin to the mythical “fear” that Obamacare might succeed scares the GOP. Uhm. Who? Who!? Every single person on the right I’ve ever talked to fears it will screw up the country. This other thing is just plain made up.
- More terror in Africa.
- Evil.
- Two hunger strikes.
- Uhm, duh.
Wednesday, September 11th, 2013 at 9:16 pm
Woo. Three days in a row … and three and a half weeks to go and busy busy busy season might be over (except for the clean up).
- Guns and the racist race baiting left.
- Here’s a likely suggestion (with material to back it up) … the biggest NSA problem has been journalists and the FISA court judiciary. Another question that came to me is if NSA has cracked https … banking is not secure … and how much money has been stolen?
- On the other hand, there is likely good fallout from the NSA kerfuffle, to whit codes are always easier for the code users than the breaker from a computability standpoint. Piss off the crypto-crowd and the encoding standards will be computationally safe in the next round.
- ’cause there’s no there there, allegedly … but if that’s the case, why hide?
- The way of winning that was left to non-sprinters like me, but rarely ever got … ’cause I sort of sucked.
- Three words and the pretty much empty set of people who know the meaning of all three (I was not one of those who knew those words, btw).
- Philosophy.
- Teuthidian tech.
- Mr Obama’s speech summed up from the left.
- A question raised by the same.
- Explaining the non-existence of philosophers teaching ethics.
For 9/11
- A tweet noted.
- A photo.
- Lyrical.
Monday, September 9th, 2013 at 6:45 pm
A week in the middle … the last few weeks big push is over … and I’m in cleanup mode for traveling to Alabama next week and the next push.
- Jesus’ maternal grandparents noted.
- Badum, bing.
- I’m missing where this is a problem.
- This is not unrelated.
- Zombies and brainz.
- Hum drum home drone.
- A book list.
- A fistful of (not dollars) but something else mindful of dirt.
- The last frame is the kicker.
- A teaching method with results.
- A question, the answer … ambition.
- A question regarding Syria.
- A protestant (I think) sees an Eastern Paschal celebration.
- Not just one “red line” in the Middle East.
- Israel not the only frakking country in the Middle East either.
- Three essays on Syrian intervention: here, here and here.
- On scientific malpractice.
Tuesday, September 3rd, 2013 at 11:38 am
A while back, I gave my cautious approval to an NSA program that said it was just collecting phone call metadata; information about calls – like the phone numbers, and date & time – but not the calls themselves. We can get this same information about government phones, so keeping ours didn’t seem that big a deal. Still, it seemed a bit of overreach.
Well, we now have more information coming out of the NSA telling us that, well, they did make a few oopsies. They told Bloomberg News that, over the past decade, very rare instances of willful violations of NSA’s authorities have been found. Clever use of the passive voice there; no actual names of agents were mentioned. Another spokesman said that the actions were the work of overzealous NSA employees or contractors. Yeah, and just a few “overzealous” IRS workers in Cincinnati were responsible for the entire scandal of targeting conservatives.
Like most government wrongdoing, this is going to come out in dribs and drabs. Had it stopped with the revelation of phone call metadata, I could have been OK with it. But now we’re hearing about a few slipups here and later a few there.
I know, I know. Give government power and they’ll first take more, and then abuse it. Wow, now who could have anticipated that?
Monday, September 2nd, 2013 at 11:26 am
Blogger Donald Sensing noted that someone writing at the very liberal Daily Kos website was rather irked that, due to ObamaCare, she’d wind up paying over $8000 a year for what she called “crappy, high-deductible insurance” in New York state. The writer notes, “This means we will all be required to pay steep premiums and deductibles but may not have the financial resources to actually access healthcare.”
You mean ObamaCare is not going to be the panacea its proponents claimed it would be? Color me meh.
She concludes , “I am reminded on days like today, that President Obama campaigned on the idea that people like me would see something like a $2500 reduction in health insurance costs. What was I thinking?” Don Sensing surmises that thinking didn’t enter into it. I’d say, wow, now who could have anticipated that?
Friday, August 30th, 2013 at 11:16 am
The magazine The Nation is a liberal-leaning publication; that much is certain. What’s not so certain is whether or not they really understand the topics they cover.
Here’s a case in point. It recently asked it readers to sign an open letter to Wal-Mart demanding that they pay workers at least $12 an hour. However, another web site, ProPublica, reported, as good news, that, this fall, interns at the Nation Institute, who put out the magazine, will be paid minimum wage for the first time in the history of the 30-year-old program. Up until now they’d been paid at less than minimum wage, when all the while they railed against those who did just that.
But anyway, that’s good news, right? Those overworked interns will now get the federal minimum wage and have more to spend in our economy. Well, consider this. In a statement to ProPublica on the report, The Nation said that, “We are not yet certain how this will work out long term, but for the fall we are anticipating hiring ten interns rather than twelve.”
So they’re raising the pay, but hiring fewer workers in response. Wow, now who could have anticipated that?
Wednesday, August 28th, 2013 at 8:14 pm
Still busy, but trying to make time for y’all
- Bzaaaap!
- Hmmm, two ways to go on that … yes censuring both is in order, but only one was a family hour/children’s TV hostess/actress.
- Here, however, is a third way you probably haven’t considered.
- “I have not yet made a decision” and the subtext is that we all remember “I’m the guy who spent knew for 9 months where Bin Laden and it took all that time for me to make up my mind to go after him.” Somebody should remind him, not to draw a do not cross line if it is just a bluff. Like the bin Laden attack, we’ll have to wait for a wag-the-dog domestic prompt to get us to move.
- Related to the above. So, prior to being elected President, Mr Obama was firmly against Presidential unilateral military action, now he’s for it (indeed done it). Stupid or evil (that is, was he so dumb he didn’t anticipate reasons for doing so, or was he lying when he said he was against it?) Liberals keep telling how smart they are, which alas, leaves the “evil” alternative.
- I think this belief noted (that racism is the motive) is common on the left. It remains interesting (ironic?) that that assumption is itself the essence of bigotry.
- Guns and legal control. Back when I was in school, a very good cartoon was on a door in our dorm … “People don’t kill people, Toasters kill people.” with the image of a guy falling down dead with toast impaling his back and another holding a toaster like a mortar.
- “Noble cause corruption” isn’t noble but it is indeed corruption.
- Chemicals to leave for the professionals.
- Academic potential.
- Who done it?
- A short way from surrealism is hyper-realism, both I will admit to liking.
- A mistake I’ve made.
Monday, August 19th, 2013 at 8:06 pm
Mr Taranto highlighted a Yglesias post in which Mr Yglesias opines against educational meritocracy. Mr Yglesias is wrong in assuming that “white people” would have problems with Asians getting more places in higher education based on their higher grades and test scores. I offer myself as one white person who sees nothing at all wrong and a lot right with more people with better grades and test scores regardless of the color of their skin getting into the better schools. Furthermore he concludes:
But rather than dedicating the most resources to the “best” students and then fighting over who’s the best, we should be allocating resources to the people who are mostly likely to benefit from additional instructional resources.
I wholeheartedly agree. We should allocate more of our educational resources to those who are most likely to benefit from additional instructional resources. Who are those people most likely to benefit? We call them the gifted students (at least those gifted students who are also willing to work hard).